Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LAX (group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LAX (group)

LAX (group) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Possible non-notable band --adavidw 00:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I originally nominated this article for a speedy delete, but it clearly does qualify. However it does fails WP:BAND, I couldn't find any third party sources whatsoever. --Daniel J. Leivick 00:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete I did find a few third party mentions on Google, but not non-trivial treatment in multiple reliable sources. Their one single does not appear to have made it onto any national charts. They do have a page at allmusic but notably, no discography, charts or awards listed. Willing to consider further information of course.--Fuhghettaboutit 02:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for above reasons Shaundakulbara 02:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Bigtop 03:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete After a search in Google, I can see that this band is not really notable, and, kind of, in the making. ← ANAS ^Talk? 06:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 09:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Non-notable band. S.D. ¿п? § 12:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per notablity concerns. JCO312 15:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable Johnbod 17:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This group does not appear to meet the established criteria for musicians and ensembles, and a Google search does not provide any confidence that sources exist that would rectify this. Seventypercent 17:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete lack of notability, does not meet WP:MUSIC requirements.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for all of the above reasons, and although the creator contests speedy deletion, she doesn't offer any further evidence to demonstrate notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This article is about a band which is not known worldwide and therefore has no notability on Wikipedia. Tellyaddict 19:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Not notable. I doubt it even exsists. Retiono Virginian 19:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• It exists, actually, and it is involved with a notable label, Blackground Records. They seem to be getting some attention, judging from this piece] on Radio Disney that claims one of their songs is moving up the charts (Radio 1 had it at #73 in December but I can't find it otherwise), but beyond that, I see a bunch of blogs and little other coverage. Weak delete unless something turns up during this discussion. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep If the band exsists, with evidence to back it up. It obviously is notable and could be kept for wikipedia. Retiono Virginian 21:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Existence is not notability, evidence must support notablity. --Daniel J. Leivick 21:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. Fail most of WP:BAND; does not merit inclusion at this time. Ronbo76 14:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.