Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L3 LANs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 04:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] L3 LANs

L3 LANs (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

Self-promotion/Conflict of interest and notability. Also in the thread [1], they laugh at the fact that they have an article present on wikipedia for such a low numbered community (100 ppl). Lincher 04:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete "those wiki people are gonna catch on eventually..." Indeed. -- IslaySolomon | talk 04:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. non-notable. — Moondyne 04:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. I'm catching on, and so are others of "those wiki people." OfficeGirl 04:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 08:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete "LAN dollar"? WikiBot 00:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The event is not well-known/notable enough to qualify as a Wikipedia article.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Sounds interesting, but without citations to respectable independent sources to verify its notability, I have to say Delete.-- danntm ^T _C 03:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Not notable; vainity. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 04:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete; probably a db-group wouldn't have been inappropriate. On the verge of WP:SNOW early AfD closure. --Nehwyn 18:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.