Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Wendell Licon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] L. Wendell Licon

L. Wendell Licon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Zero assertion of notability beyond the university where he teaches. Travellingcari (talk) 01:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Kakofonous (talk) 02:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete If we had an article for every professor in every university, we would probably double the articles already on Wikipedia. Absolutely not notable. Timmeh! 02:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

not that this assistant professor is notable, but WP could perfectly well grow to 4 million --or 6 or 8 or whatever number of articles is necessary.DGG (talk) 04:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Assistant professor whose vita is empty of research publications beyond his doctoral dissertation five years ago. Clear fail of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:PROF. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I see no claim of notability, or evidence that he passes WP:PROF. Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Non notable; Google reveals only six results. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 04:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.