Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoko Web

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 04:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kyoko Web

Kyoko Web (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This topic gets very few google hits. I'm not entirely convinced it is real or if it is, what it is about. It was tagged for speedy deletion as an attack page, but that didn't really seem to fit and the prod has been removed, so I am bringing it here. BigDT 00:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. First, the form is bad, and doesn't clearly explain what happens, or even the etymology of the term. Second, even the article admits it's not notable. --Dennisthe2 00:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article doesn't even detail what the "Kyoko Web" legend is supposed to be about. There are no examples, yet there are supposed to be at least 5 variations of this.

It seems that "Kyoko" is attempting to create an urban legend about herself. I don't know why, but I agree that there doesn't seem to be any urban legend called "Kyoko Web." I found 1 reference to the existance of the story, but no examples of it.

63.195.188.162 00:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. If the author admits ii isn't notable, that's good enough for me. :-) Realkyhick 01:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non notable--$UIT 01:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not notable. Acalamari 02:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - the creator of the article has created no other articles outside of the subject of this AfD. --Dennisthe2 02:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable HornandsoccerTalk 03:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete the article itself says it all "While the Kyoko Web isn't a popular enough myth to appear on many sites or blogs[...]" No listing at Snopes, the ultimate compilation of urban legends, few gHits, if this was really a popular internet meme or legend, you'd expect to see more of a net presence. Possible hoax? Wintermut3 03:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - not notable, not referenced. There's no 'core' to the article, no 'tale' in the tale. This is a campfire story that would put everyone to sleep. Shenme 05:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Campfire? Dude, I nearly fell asleep at work reading it! --Dennisthe2 06:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per lack of notability and references. Sr13 (T|C) 09:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. —dima/talk/ 18:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable Thewinchester (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.