Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Miller
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per unanimous consensus. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 03:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kyle Miller
I believe that this article fails WP:BIO, specifically because there are no non-trivial published articles about Kyle Miller from a reputable news source. Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 06:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC) :* Great, I screwed up the template and have no idea how to fix it. I probably shouldn't be editing when I am so tired - can someone fix it for me? --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 06:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Citation to Washington Post was already in the article, I've also added an Amped citation, but the Washington post article alone should be enough. —siroχo 09:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Siroxo, from browsing Google there seems to be several articles written about him, albeit on niche websites. hateless 10:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Although not as notable as for instance Manuel Schenkhuizen or Johan Quick, this person is a top professional in his field (video gaming), which is reason enough to pass WP:BIO. The article needs some sourcing and pov cleanups, though. -- DJiTH 13:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep, article should be cleaned up and properly sourced ASAP. Top people in their field should have no problem to pass WP:BIO Alf photoman 18:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above, although clearly needs cleanup. schi talk 01:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep per Siroxo. Miller is definitely a notable Counter-Strike player. --Credema 22:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep major media coverage makes him pass WP:BIO (even if barely... he still does pass) ALKIVAR™ ☢ 07:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.