Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kye
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Eluchil404 21:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kye
Article, which has existed since late 2005, is about a possibly non-notable computer game. A search for the game along with the name of the developer gets under 100 google hits. I wrote to the author of this game around ten years ago, actually, as I enjoyed it at the time, and received a response through the post, but I don't think it's notable. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 20:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: the article has no references but it has some external links which could be used for as them, however, It requires a complete rewrite - Pheonix 20:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment. The external links do not appear to be reliable sources.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 21:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep - Every once in a while something comes along that's notable, but proves a sourcing nightmare. This seems to be one such article, and while I vote weak keep it would need MASSIVE cleanup (perhaps a rewrite almost) to stay. -WarthogDemon 22:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. As I understand it, a subject is only notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial reliable published sources. Find me some professional sources on this if you can...-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete unless sources are found to attest notabilityCorpx 03:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)- Keep - I think several reviews by independent reviewers are enough ([1], [2]). Also, apparently there's still versions of it being developed and played (e.g. [3]), which adds more notability than if it was just yet another Boulderdash clone from 1992. So enough notability to have an article in my book. --Allefant 11:06, 10
August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.