Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kullawada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kullawada

Kullawada (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

NN dance. No sources to indicate any sense of satisfying WP:N. meshach (talk) 02:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC) meshach (talk) 02:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I rewrote the article and added a source. Not sure how to gauge notability of Bolivian folk dances. Folk dances should be inherently notable as part of a regions culture. Dlohcierekim 03:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I see more potential sources on Google. Unfortunately, not in English. Dlohcierekim 04:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I agree with the comment above: a folk dance is inherently notable. The best sources are probably offline and in Spanish, but we have enough to verify its existence, so it should stay. Zagalejo^^^ 04:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Delete, The only sentence is directly taken from the first source violating WP:C. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 15:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Refs establish the dance as culturally significant. Chubbles (talk) 16:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.