Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulachi Hansraj Model School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus (10 Keep 7 Delete) Redwolf24 01:41, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kulachi Hansraj Model School

Not of sufficent notariety Usrnme h8er 09:59, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

  • The last few paras are obviously vanity, but policy is to keep all school articles. Work needed nevertheless. Agentsoo 10:57, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
    • No it isn't there is no policy on schools. An organised Cabal votes to keep all school articles regardless, which makes even the most mundane primary schools undeletable (and before you say anything I spent a large proportion of today writing John Cleveland College). Dunc|☺ 16:23, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Once the bottom three vanity paragraphs are removed you're left with a one-sentence microstub, and in that condition, the article is nearly completely useless. Delete, although I'll change my vote (to reflect precedent) if the article is made informative. --Scimitar parley 13:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete No demonstration of notability. Dunc|☺ 16:23, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Maybe for once we can get rid of a garbage school article. --Carnildo 21:16, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Expand & Keep. --Jpbrenna 21:46, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • keep please it is our defacto policy to keep these already Yuckfoo 22:44, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
    • That's a bit of an over-egging the no-consensus-either-way pudding. -Splash 23:20, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. There's nothing here worth keeping and there's not the slightest hint of notability about the place. -Splash 23:20, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, this interesting school. See wikipedia:Schools/Arguments Kappa 01:39, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per policy. Nothing of interest. Jayjg (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, NPOV and verifiable. Christopher Parham (talk) 03:42, 2005 July 29 (UTC)
  • Keep. All schools are notable enough for a truly great encyclopaedia. —RaD Man (talk) 04:37, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
    • If that's true, then I'd prefer to make a lousy encyclopedia. --Carnildo 05:29, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete unless cleaned up. Vegaswikian 07:26, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep verifiable and NPOV schools. There is no need to clean up and expand before changing your votes to keep, it's quite clear this article is expandable and able to be cleaned up (and, in fact, already has been). DoubleBlue (Talk) 13:53, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. Claiming there is a policy doesn't make one, and "defacto policy" somehow did not apply to changes to CSD, did it? - brenneman(t)(c) 14:06, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Schools are inherently notable due to their influence on thousands of individuals. Unfocused 16:32, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all schools which turn Tennyson poems into stupid mottos. Gamaliel 17:12, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep all enduring institutions. --Gene_poole 07:20, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Ianblair23 11:21, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.