Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuat Drive Yards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 20:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kuat Drive Yards

I nominate this article to be deleted because it does not pass wikipedia's notability critereon in regards to works of fiction. The article is entirely a plot summary or description of a fictional setting, whereas wikipedia fiction notability guidelines require there to be some sort of encylopedic content connecting the fiction to the real world (for example "kuat drive yards was contraversial amongst the star wars fan fiction community, who thought that the space ships should have been created by the force, this led to a large letter writing protest targetting lucas arts"). As I believe there is not one scentence any person could write in this article that is not a plot summary, biography or description of a fictional place, I nominate it for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laimerpramer (talk • contribs)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. This is a notable part of a very notable fictional universe, and should not be deleted. But I agree that it should be more Out of Universe in it's content. It was a big part of the Bounty Hunter trilogy, and should mention that. -LtNOWIS 23:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Lt. Nowis; this plays a major role throughout the star wars universe; the article needs more of an out of universe perspective and less plot summary in favor of its actual significance in the universe. — Deckiller 19:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Coment - Describing the significance of the fictional location in the star wars universe still counts as purely plot description from my perspective.

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mangojuice^talk 17:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per above Valoem ^talk 18:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.