Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krustylu studios

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Krustylu studios

Krustylu studios (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I don't believe this web site meets the notability guidelines at WP:WEB FisherQueen (Talk) 09:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete, no notability per WP:WEB. Arkyan • (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Neither notable or important. --- RockMFR 20:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect to Krusty. JuJube 21:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, borders on fancruft, fails WP:WEB. Realkyhick
  • Delete, selfless plug made by homerofwar07, also user in question has been previously banned, fails WP:WEB. Kampkrusty3796
  • Leave IT!Please Ignore the member Kampkrusty3796, as he was banned form krustylu studios and trying to get his revenge on the site. I believe The Article should stay, many members of the site love reading the history on it. They like having it on this great site wikipedia. I really don't think it would be notable to mods on this site, I mean think about it when was the last time you actuality looks for a simpsons forum. You guys should be a little more fair, there are thousounds of other people who dont have wikipedia account but browse wikipedia, they like reading the history on the network here at wikipedia instead of trying to find ti on krustylu studios Having ti on wikipedia also allows people to add in anythings I mist —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homerofwar2007 (talk • contribs)
Have you read WP:WEB? If there's a way in which this web site meets that standard, please point it out, so that we don't have to delete the article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.