Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen Pazik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  16:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kristen Pazik

Another non-notable biography of a non-notable "(Wag)". i.e. a football player's wife not notable enough to warrant her own article. Article has never really progressed beyond unsourced and unverifiable paparazzi rumours. Fails: Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Reliable Sources. --  Netsnipe  ^(Talk)  13:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC) )

• Comment: However, what is interesting from an intellectual standpoint is the public reaction to a woman who seeks publicity by appearing nude in salacious photographs while dating/married to a famous man who is involved in politics or sports, i.e. an area which generates some measure of respect. Although it may be common to see European models seeking attention in this manner, when a woman is dating a public figure with social status, the public seems to prefer for her to act with integrity and this type of self promotion can generate scorn. Similarly, if a woman had achieved a similar level of social status, these actions may not be considered appropriate. Interesting topic for discussion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Realinformation (talk • contribs) .

• Reply: So by maintaining this article (I've noted you have yet to contribute to any other article on Wikipedia), then you are pushing your own agenda and willfully breaching the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. In my book, this is indeed grounds for outright deletion. --  Netsnipe  ^(Talk)  14:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - I couldn't find the policy on keeping on unverified rumours about non-notable people in order to generate discussion on a related topic, but if somebody uncovers it, I'll change my opinion. Yomangani 16:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Valrith 20:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Sorry - just happened to know info about this particular person - didn't mean to push my own agenda or to break any rules. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Realinformation (talk • contribs)
• Redirect to her husband, Andriy Shevchenko, who is at least clearly notable in his own right. It may be possible to make a case that Pazik is notable enough in her own right to qualify under WP:BIO but I will leave that to others. --Metropolitan90 02:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.