Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Craig
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 19:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kris Craig, That DAMNED Liberal Show
Tagged nn-bio, contested. Seems to be "notable" solely as the host of an "Internet radio" show (i.e. webcast) of no provable significance. Rolling in the show, That DAMNED Liberal Show, which makes a single (and unprovable / uncoited) claim to fame. Looks like a case of WP:HOLE to me. Just zis Guy you know? 09:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete That DAMNED Liberal Show as unverifiable (no Google hits). Delete Kris Craig as non-notable, fails WP:BIO and WP:HOLE (though WP:HOLE isn't a policy). --Coredesat 09:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete, possibly Speedy per Coredesat. Not entirely sure what claim to notability in the Craig's article got the BIO tag removed (there is only one that I could find, and that one was marginal at best). By any means, neither of these articles demonstrates the subjects' notability to a level appropriate for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Kuzaar-T-C- 13:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- delete both ugh - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both per the above. I would also watch for sockpuppets in those articles as Kris Craig has contributed to Universal health care as User:Sir kris, User:24.17.137.180, and User:24.19.255.254 (per discussion in Talk:Universal health care/Archive 1). For what it's worth, User:67.183.207.37 is my latest suspect as he has also recently contributed to Universal health care, Kris Craig, and That DAMNED Liberal Show. -AED 18:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both as per the above & per WP:VANITY. Also please note that User:168.103.173.14 removed the AfD header on both articles (I restored), so if that IP address is a sockpuppet for
Kris Craiganyone,hethey would appear to be showing bad faith &/or poor judgement in this matter. Thanks -- Argon233 T C @ ∉ 19:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment - should also consider removing Kristopher David Craig as well, as it is a redirect to Kris Craig. Also perhaps we should have any admin investigating sockpuppets also look to see if User:Pub biographer is involved eith any of the IPs/Accounts listed above. -- Argon233 T C @ ∉ 20:23, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment See Talk:Kris Craig for the author's arguments for keeping the article. Mak (talk) 21:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Both after reading the author's arguments for keeping that article. An interview? WP:NOR fail, in addition to the zero notoriety and van-vertising noted above. --DaveG12345 23:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both, after reading the article AND the author's rhetorical handwaving on the talk page. Man, I HATE wikilawyering. --Calton | Talk 06:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.