Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kring's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 23:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kring's Law

Supposedly "a mainstay of Internet culture". Google tells us it has been used 21 times in only one forum, lavag.org. Fails WP:NEO. -- Fan-1967 03:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. When it becomes as notable as Godwin's Law, it's a valid inclusion. BigHaz 03:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. VoiceOfReason 03:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This should be filed under WP:NFT.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — 8 hits by google appears to be user spam about NN topic Betacommand 05:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. NN. --Bigtop 05:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Law passed to hereby delete this article. -- Gogo Dodo 05:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity page. Admin should also nuke Image:JKring.jpg which is only used in that page. Dgies 07:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - although the barefaced cheek of calling it a 'mainstay of internet culture' made me smile.--Nydas 10:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable 'theory'.--TheM62Manchester 11:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable neologism. It's hardly a "mainstay of Internet culture" if it's only been used on one forum. JIP | Talk 18:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Probably significantly less notable than Geogre's Law. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity page. --DarkAudit 01:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity page... a "mainstay" in 6 months or less indeed... --Svartalf 02:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, this term is not yet a mainstay. Yamaguchi先生 23:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.