Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krewmembers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! Mailer Diablo 14:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Krewmembers

  ATTENTION!

If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum asking you to do so, please note that the deletion process is designed to determine the consensus of opinion of Wikipedia editors; for this reason comments from users whose histories do not show experience with or contributions to Wikipedia, and particularly, to this article, are traditionally given less weight and may be discounted entirely by the Closing Administrator.

You are not barred from participating in the discussion, or making your opinion known here, no matter how new you may be, and we welcome reasoned opinions and rational discussion based upon our policies and guidelines. However, ballot stuffing is pointless. There is no ballot to stuff, because decisions are not made upon weight of numbers alone. This is a place to ascertain the consensus of the Wikipedia community. Please review Wikipedia:Deletion policy for more information.

Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!
  • Keep - Its a webcomic, not very big but more popular than many that have their own entries. Although the article needs to stress more on the webcomic, not on the forum. -Noob User 06:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - appears to be nothing more than promoting a non-notable website/forum, advertisement, vanity WilliamThweatt 04:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom - looks like they're mostly just an attack group of some sort.Tony Fox 04:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep it's a page about a webcomic & the history behind it. No vandalism or attacks, potential for growth. Zombie Dave 05:33, 8 May 2006
Note:this user appears to have been created purely to vote in this AFD (the above entry is their only ever edit), and so is probably the article creator. mgekelly 05:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Vanity. mgekelly 04:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete spam. --MaNeMeBasat 05:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Doesn't appear to be especially notable. Zaxem 05:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable website/forum. Alexa rank of 2,724,297, WP:WEB refers.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable web forum, vanity. JIP | Talk 06:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep This (still in early writing stages) article is about a legitimate fledgling webcomic based off of the life and times of the forum go-ers and the conversations within the threads in said forum. Drawingfreak 02:59, 8 May 2006 (EST)
to closing admin: this is this users first and second edit
  • Delete non notable website, advertising.--Dakota ~ 07:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete advert -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 07:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WilliamThweatt. DarthVader 08:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 09:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I ran across this webcomic while researching webcomics for a project. I believe this comic is more valuable then many others that have thier own wikipedia page. I do believe their entry could be cleaned up and expanded but I do not feel it should be deleted. GHGoddess 11:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - this is GHGoddess's only edit--WilliamThweatt 18:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Does this mean that my comments are untrue? This is simply the first thread I felt deserved my time. Thank you,GHGoddess 12:34, 8 May 2006
  • Delete Ironically, User:Drawingfreak's keep argument is actually a good reason to delete. In Wikipedia, if your site can still be described as "fledgeling", it probably hasn't achieved enough notice for us to maintain a document that abides by the three content criteria (i.e., WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:NOR). Many assume getting an article on Wikipedia is a good way to get the word out, but that's not how it works. Krewmembers will get more traffic from Wikipedia over the days of this AFD than it would for years otherwise. It's just one article in a million, after all. If you'd like this up on a Wiki, I recommend Comixpedia:. It is based on the same MediaWiki software, uses the same license, and is dedicated specifically to webcomics. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 19:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment' - Yes it is just one article in a million, which makes me wonder whats with the attack group, non-notable web forum, spam tags? Its no wonder wikipedia still gets blasted, you guys cant even do research before typing down your opinions. And why put up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Webcomics at all if a webcomic isnt allowed an entry? -HailCeasar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.10.184.66 (talk • contribs)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.