Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kragujevac- Amidza palace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 07:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kragujevac- Amidza palace moved to Amidža Palace

From WP:PNT, been there since December 15. Discussion from WP:PNT follows... Segv11 (talk/contribs) 20:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Croatian. The first sentence states that it is a 19th century palace located in central Serbia, in weak English. The next two sentences are in Croatian. — TheKMantalk 19:52, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
*Searching Google for "Amidza palace" brings up 2 unique hits. — TheKMantalk 06:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Nominator abstains. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 20:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • comment seems to be talking about The Amidža Konak, which is mentioned in the Kragujevac article. I suggest redirecting this to The Amidža Konak, and writing an article there. Jcuk 22:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Relisted for more input. Johnleemk | Talk 09:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep As this clearly exists it should be kept. It would not be deleted if it was in England. I have moved it to Amidža Palace (on the basis that Konak appears to be the local word for palace and should not be in the title) and have categorised and Serbia-stubbed it, which will improve its chances of getting more content soon. Calsicol 15:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Amidža Konak gets plenty of google hits. It was even mentioned in the British House of Commons due to damage it suffered in the recent wars. Calsicol 15:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and Translate per above Werdna648T/C\@ 09:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep notable loction and is now translated. Stifle 21:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.