Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korn's ninth studio album

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Korn's ninth studio album

Korn's ninth studio album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

we don't know even the title of 8 album and excluding ONE sentence said by jonathan davis there is no official confirmation. There is no reason to write anything about this "album" ... or mayby we should leave only those two-three sentences in the main article Panzerny 21:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

  • KeepExactly what Bejnar said: there'll have to be an article here soon anyway. So why not just keep it and edit as more info becomes availible? That seems like common sense to me.URFG 19:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)URFG
  • Keep more news is being generated, and the album will soon be up here anyway. Jmlk17 21:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is an example of exactly why some pundits reject using Wikipedia. This article may be written, with a proper title, when and if the album is released. "Wilkie defeats Truman". Furor does not equal notability or anything else. --Bejnar 00:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for now. There's already enough information with the band's eighth album. There seems to be a lot of speculation with the article and no resources whatsoever which makes it original research. Also, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Douglasr007 05:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. When there's enough information to make the article without crystalballing it can be reposted under the album's correct name. 86.140.3.176 18:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment The above vote was by User:A1octopus who had forgotten to sign in.
  • Delete The problem is that in fact there ain't any information about this album... and most of this article is complete bullshit ( David recovering from wrist injury <sic!> ?? it was 7 years ago !! . ) . Many of those "facts" are taken from comments the band made about how the eight album is gonna sound, not about the NINTH one. Panzerny 13:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete If and when it comes out, make a new article. Until then, I say delete it. Slavlin 21:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.