Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kong Studios

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower háblame 18:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kong Studios

The article is about the virtual residence of a "virtual band" and is crufty. Apparently the virtual band itself is notable. It should be deleted, or at very least, merged and redirected to the band's article, which is what I boldly did earlier, only to be reversed. - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 22:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as per WP:WEB. --Chris 22:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
    • This is not about a website, Chris. - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 22:56, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
      • It's about a studio that only exists on the web... a website. Or am I missing something? --Chris 23:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
        • Keep seeing as how I see no real reason to delete it. I saw no evidence of it being merged with the Gorillaz article. The proper channels were certainly not followed. It is my understanding that the tags labeling an article for merger consideration are there for a reason. Also, merging generally involves making changes to the article being merged into. Being virtual should have no bearing on whether or not it is notable. Also, this article is not about the website that represent Kong Studios, it is about Kong Studios itself. The website is simply a source of information as to what Kong Studios is like. Cawifre 02:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Arbusto 07:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom; suggest Cawifre merge the content into the main Gorillaz article. —Chris Chittleborough 10:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 11:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I would gladly merge the Kong article into the main article. The only reason I simply reverted to a non-redirect is because there was no evidence of the article having ever been merged or nominated for a merger. You can check the history of the Kong Studios and Gorillaz articles for yourself if you wish. I change my vote to merge and redirect. Seriously though, it was not merged, it was blanked.
  • Should probably be merged to Gorillaz. — Mar. 30, '06 [08:06] <freakofnurxture|talk>


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.