Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koala sunday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Koala sunday

Koala sunday (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Hoax - Google for "Koala Sunday" Eugene Oregon shows no related hits. Sigma 7 11:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up in your bathrobe one Sunday. —Celithemis 11:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for all the reasons above and then some. House of Scandal 11:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The image about sums it up. J Milburn 12:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Should have been a speedy! Maustrauser 12:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Do Not Delete This activity is well established in our area. Since when did google dictate what is real and what is not? This tradition is rapidly spreading in Eugene, Oregon, despite what your search engine results may convey. This tradition is real: If you wish to censor truthful information from wikipedia, then I'd suggest you're attempting to contradict everything the site stands for. knuckifbuck 4:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment:If it is such a big celebration, why have there not been any news articles about it? Why has no one written about it at all? And if they have, why is it not mentioned in the article? Also, your argument 'It is real, therefore deserves an article.' Does not work. Read this for the reasoning why. J Milburn 13:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:NFT. Terence Ong 14:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete if it's not a hoax then it's certainly not notable. Large portions of it look like nonsense. Hut 8.5 15:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete clearly a hoax - delete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fredrick day (talk • contribs) 18:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.