Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowyourmoney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied Spam. the_undertow ^talk 03:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Knowyourmoney

Knowyourmoney (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Short article on a website. Has been tagged as orphan from Nov 2006, has no third-party sources (only a link to their website), and was created by a spam purpose account. No demonstration of notability, no WP:RS, no verifiability. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 18:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete per lack of significant coverage from independent sources. I'd classify hits on g-news as trivial Corpx 01:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Carlossuarez46 00:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom. WP:NN, provides no WP:RS, and fails to meet WP:WEB. No assertion of notability. --Evb-wiki 01:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete not significant. No good sources. To my opinion, the page verges on being Spam.Brusegadi 01:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable site from what I can see. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 01:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete nn stub... Balloonman 03:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete, non-notable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 03:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.