Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knots per sq cm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was kept, and moved to knot density. DS 20:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Knots per sq cm
I don't see how this article about something that's not very important can be expanded any further. Joiz. A. Shmo 22:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Being generous and Googling knots+"square cm"+carpet, I get about 400 results (85 unique), which at least shows the concept exists, but doesn't give much reason for there to be a separate article on this rather than a mention at carpet (when I first saw the article title, I thought this was going to be about a weird unit of some kind of velocity flux). Confusing Manifestation 01:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Rename — Suggest renaming this to "Knot density" and covering the topic in general. There are several different measures of knot density in use, including knots per square inch, decimeter, meter, &c., so one article that covers them all would be good. Alternatively it can be merged with carpet. — RJH (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Odd. It reads like its original research personally. Where's the sources for what is considered high/mid/low quality carpet? Suggest Merge to rug making. But if someone doing the merger can't find any sources for this stuff (which, again, sounds like original research), might as well just redirect and leave a note on rug making's talk page about the content about the fate of the content that wasn't sourced at all. Kevin_b_er 21:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.