Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knights of Noblemen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was dealt with by copyvio. - Mailer Diablo 06:45, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Knights of Noblemen

NN, copyvio, reads partly like an advertisement.--DooMDrat 08:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, per nomination.--DooMDrat 08:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as copyvio of [1]. Please don't indulge in the silly habit of voting in addition to nominating. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:06, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advert, part copyvio, and non-notable. Trying for the full set :-) Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 12:00, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertisement. *drew 13:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Please follow proper copyvio procedures. —Cryptic (talk) 21:16, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, whether copyvio or not, as advert of NN online game. I think it's proper to list here and list as a copyvio—otherwise, we'd still be stuck with this crap if (as may be likely) the dumped text is not actually a copyvio but was dumped here by its author. There's no reason the two processes can't work in tandem to axe this article. But don't just list here if it's a suspected copyvio. Postdlf 21:27, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.