Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleptophilia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was del. mikka (t) 23:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kleptophilia

Non-notable fetish community term, no hits on Lexisnexis, no hits on American Psychological Association articles search. No sources for it, so it is unverifiable. There is one article in Google scholar that says it means the same as kleptomania and is not a widely used term. So mainly it fails wikipedia's verifiability guideline. Google search for Kleptophilia and paraphilia get 403 hits, which is kind of notable, but remember my charge of verifiability. Pretty low notability for a fetish term in google, and yeah, I turned off my safe search. One stray article mentioning it meaning kleptomania isn't enough to justify it being a redirect, I think. Lotusduck 05:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Merge and Redirect to kleptomania. Kleptolagnia should also be looked at. — TheKMan^talk 08:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

I did google kleptolagnia and search it on APA and LexisNexis with similar results, 400 hits on google, no hits anywhere else. I guess I'll have to either delete or redirect kleptolagnia too? Lotusduck 22:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable from reliable sources. Same with kleptolagnia. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 14:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per JzG. Stifle 00:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.