Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittyloaf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kittyloaf

Kittyloaf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable 'thing'

• Comment Please note I didn't initiate this AfD, the originator did not create this discussion page so I did. Q ^{T C} 04:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Looks encyclopedic. Could use some sources to establish its notability, but I have a feeling they may well exist, so I recommend keeping the article, and slapping a {{notability}} and a {{unsourced}} on there. Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} - Review me! 06:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete very minor fictional character, I note that we do not have pages for the book it appeared in or the author who created it. Seems to be actually stealth spam for a page on YTMND. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per lack of 3rd party coverage to establish notability Corpx 04:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable meme. We don't even have anything to say about the topic, let alone source. -- Ned Scott 04:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.