Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitty Litter Cake
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 19:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kitty Litter Cake
Thank you for cleaning up this article but I suspect it will continue to be a source of vandalism. And do we usually keep recipes or not? I am not sure. Postcard Cathy 22:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. I believe that a recipe would fall into this category and should be deleted as such. It is also OR. --Cyrus Andiron 15:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - this isn't a recipe but just a straightforward description. We have Angel cake, Sponge cake etc. It could do with a photo, though. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 15:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment: Trust me, if you follow the link in the article, you see a picture and it made me almost throw up. Not a good idea! 172.134.126.84 01:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep as a slightly notable gag, if only by memetics. Clean it up, and please clean out the cat box. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment: Since when has wikipedia been a place for "notable gag" articles? Then any joker can come in and write anything they want saying it was only a gag. 172.134.126.84 01:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's a straw man argument. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Then you can be the one to keep cleaning up the vandalism. I found it once as have others, IIRC. I don't want to keep cleaning up the vandalism. So I nominate you to watch it and clean it up. 172.134.126.84 03:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ain't my job, man, it'll just work itself out. And to note, vandalism magnetism isn't a reason for deletion. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Then you can be the one to keep cleaning up the vandalism. I found it once as have others, IIRC. I don't want to keep cleaning up the vandalism. So I nominate you to watch it and clean it up. 172.134.126.84 03:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's a straw man argument. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Since when has wikipedia been a place for "notable gag" articles? Then any joker can come in and write anything they want saying it was only a gag. 172.134.126.84 01:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep, some notability... Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
