Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kit Jarrell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - not notable per the guidelines at WP:BIO, for example has not been the primary subject of a published work nor do they get lots of distinguishable hits on Google (to pick just two of the tests on WP:BIO, the others are not met either). Thanks/wangi 12:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kit Jarrell

Non notable blogger, delete --Peta 04:17, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Wide Awakes Radio per other non-notable radio show hosts, if that article survives its afd nomination, otherwise delete. Thryduulf 10:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Blogger has been nominated for several awards such as being the Weblog Awards finalist in 2005, being the #10 milblog site, and has interviewed many important figures on her show including Diana Irey, Ilario Pantano, and figures prominently in the Innocent 8 movement as well as other soldiers who are charged with crimes that are disputed. The Truth Laid Bear rankings for bloggers has her ranked at #96 of over 100000. She has hits in Lexis Nexis as well. -- Wistless 17:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Blogger is notable by virtue of the points listed above. Her work has been quoted in World Net Daily, Patrolling magazine, the BBC, MSNBC, the Houston Chronicle, and many others. There is no reason to delete the article other than perhaps a dislike of her views. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.72.43 (talk • contribs) — Possible single purpose account: 70.177.72.43 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Wide Awakes Radio per previous discussion. --Dennisthe2 17:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

That artice was deleted so a redirect will not work. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wide Awakes Radio --70.48.174.220 20:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Would say that she meets the notability criteria myself. One of the very few notable bloggers out there. I won't be kicking and screaming if it gets merged out instead... Localzuk^(talk) 19:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BIO. Not one of the assertions by Wistless or 70.177.72.43 (above) indicate passing WP:BIO. For example, being quoted by reports in World Net Daily, etc., isn't enough--WP:BIO says that the person has to be the primary subject of the report. Pan Dan 20:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Pan Dan. The article does not at all make me believe that her role in the Ilario Pantano mess was as meaningful as is claimed. Some references that meet WP:RS might convince me to change my vote, though. --Aaron 22:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Google shows 135 000 hits. -- Petri Krohn 03:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: That is not correct. First of all, you must enter the search term in quotes, or else you find any article with the word "kit" or the word "jarrell". Once you do that, it gets you down to an estimated 44,900. Next, you must always go to the last page to accurately determine the true number of GHits. In this case, the correct number is 176. Finally, you must look through the entire list and discount duplicates from the same website (they are always indented). This give you the final count of unique hits, which in this case is 140. --Satori Son 14:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 10:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.