Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kish Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kish Family

Kish Family (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This appears to be a summary of an entire family of purely local notability; Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. Delete. Bearcat 23:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• I don't see a whole lot of notability here. Sorry. Delete. --Dennisthe2 23:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - This article provides no verifiable sources to establish notability. It belongs on GenWeb or a personal webpage. There are plenty of venues for purely genealogical info. Wikipedia isn't one of them. Shaundakulbara 04:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, NN family, written by a single-purpose account thus likely WP:COI. --Dhartung | Talk 06:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources, and of all the people described on the page, only James Kish has even a dubious claim to notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like a page from a family website. Sixth Estate 19:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, unless they are related to the Kallikak family ! WMMartin 15:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.