Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of Scarecrows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 20:01, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] King of Scarecrows

Unverifiable hoaxiness. No relevant Google hits on "King of Scarecrows" or "Theodore Mugswallop" (I gave up after that). Created by User:King of Scarecrows so could be userfied, I suppose. I vote BJAODN.Tonywalton  | Talk 21:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

• I think this should be moved to his userpage. Pureblade | ^Word 21:28, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Comment User:King of Scarecrows is currently a redirect to the mainspace article King of Scarecrows. Tonywalton  | Talk 21:30, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

• Dethrone and Delete as hoax. Dottore So 11:52, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity/nutbar, the sort of shtick the belongs on a userpage for someone who works on their user page more than wikipedia... Pete.Hurd 05:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.