Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Wutugu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 04:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] King Wutugu

Person may or may not be historical figure (is figure in historical book written centuries ago . . . ), the information here is not notable, the character/person is possibly minor MPW 04:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, requires cleanup. However, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a highly noteworthy book, allegedly based on history, though hardly a reliable historical source. The article needs to mention that the incidents of King Wutugu's life may be subjects of some exaggeration. But even if Wutugu was a fictional character, he is a notable one. - Smerdis of Tlön 17:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Unless he is a major character or real person, there doesn't seem to be much need for an independent article. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 02:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Fairly minor character, but the Romance is an important enough literary work that I think his impact on its plot merits a page. Shimeru 07:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Romance of the Three Kingdoms is significant, as are its characters. Wutugu is not one of the primary characters, certainly, but he is mentioned in far more than passing. Analogy arguments are weak in AFD, of course, but we have articles for characters of similar depth from Shakespeare et al, so I consider WP:BIAS to give this the final nudge toward survival. Serpent's Choice 05:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Changing my nomination for deletion. Seems there is a lot of knowledge here from these people about this character. Maybe some of you could edit the page so the next reader doesn't do the same thing I did and try to delete it because it did not say anything notable about the character? or impact on plot:) --MPW 16:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.