Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Haka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] King Haka

King Haka (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:N and WP:BIO. Clearly not notable. !! Justa Punk !! 03:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Pardon, but he's a professional wrestler...doesn't this mean that he'd be on TV and well covered etc., aside from the simple question about WP:BIO allowing professional sportspersons in their fields (even though pro wrestling is somewhat different)? Keep seems like the right answer to me. Nyttend 04:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

There is no reliable third party evidence to prove he is a wrestler. The information from the IWA website looks like promotion propoganda. And I'm told he has NOT appeared on TV as a wrestler. !! Justa Punk !! 07:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as of this writing, the article has no assertion of notability. The IWA that he wrestled for was also non-notable. Nikki311 03:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 00:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable GetDumb 01:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not notable in the slightest. MPJ-DK 06:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.