Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Black Dragon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge to RuneScape. If you want to merge other monster articles, or delete them outright, a separate AFD is needed. Ral315 (talk) 03:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] King Black Dragon

This article is about a monster from the online game RuneScape. While I personally am a fan of RuneScape, I do not feel that the subject of this article is enough. (See Wikipedia:fancruft, for instance). I would say delete or merge with the RuneScape article. --Ixfd64 10:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

• delete gamecruft Pete.Hurd 21:19, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge As much as I hate runescape, merge. It's part of series of similar articles. Should go to runescape/kbd or some such nonsense--Ewok Slayer 22:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge unless article is somehow related to other concepts. Why does it seem so hard to make a decent article about a video game monster? Article could use information about this monster in the context of larger trends, rather than strategy that only applies to this game. -- Creidieki 00:38, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Merge I think that this article, the TzTok-Jad article, and all of the other RuneScape monster articles should be merged into one big article called RuneScape monsters.

--Dtm142 18:24, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Merge I think that the KBD, the TzTok-whatever he is, the Kalph queen, and some other high lvl NPC's in Runescape should be merged into a article regarding Runescape monsters, but having all monsters would be too large an undertaking, unless someone has the time to compile a bestiary. Fshy93 19:36, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.