Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Family of Churches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] King's Family of Churches

King's Family of Churches (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Notability has still not been extrablished, though the notability tag was removed. All the websites and publications referred to are connected to the churches themselves. StAnselm (talk) 03:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep seems this is a non-commercial international organisation. So it meets WP:ORG, problem is no verifiable reference to say that. So mark it {{notability}}. ChessCreator (talk) 03:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment. It was marked with a noability tag on 5 March, but notability has not been established. Hence, the AfD. StAnselm (talk) 03:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment Yes, I noticed, no doubt the remover of the notability tag thought that the reference where enough to fulfill notability. Some don't realise that sources have to be third-party reliable sources. Could explain on the articles talk page and contact whoever removed the notability tag. ChessCreator (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep per ChessCreator. DigitalC (talk) 03:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep seems like it could do well to have some NPOV cleanup, but it fits notability. Nyttend (talk) 04:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment plus this article is only just over 1 month old. Give it time. ChessCreator (talk) 04:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I am the one who wrote the article. I am so new to Wikipedia that I had done the best I could after reading the articles about how I should write an article in Wikipedia. I decide to write about the King's Family after meeting one of their bishop in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and realize that they were doing a well-done job. When I saw that the article was so badly done, even though I try to follow the guidelines of Wikipedia and other articles, I contact a friend of mine from Rio de Janeiro. She wrote a book about churches in Brazil as part of her doctorate. Anyway, I couldn't agree with StAnselm when he said that it likes notability, because there are quiet few references(a spanish newspaper, an english newspaper, a brazilian encyclopedia for Christians, etc.). There are only two sources who belongs to the King's Family of Churches, directly. Nevertheless, if it is not good, I am asking for your help. Also, I have asked some british friend for help, because my english is not so good and this could be the cause. Thank you so much to all of you for any help. (Aramcara (talk) 05:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.