Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimona (Naruto)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kimona (Naruto)

Kimona (Naruto) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Hoax. Non-existent character in the Naruto series. As it is nothing more than fan-fiction, it fails WP:FICT, WP:V, and WP:MADEUP. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 00:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 00:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - obvious hoax. Doceirias 01:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just a Mary Sue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.197.253 (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt. This is the second one of these I've seen. Katsuhagi 01:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW. The outcome of this AfD is obvious and there is not need to go through process for process's sake. See also WP:IAR. --Farix (Talk) 02:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
    Comment: If you hadn't added the IAR link I would say it isn't SNOW because CSD specifically says no matter how obvious a hoax, doesn't apply. - Rjd0060 05:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
    Comment I think you need to reread WP:SNOW, which states, "If an issue doesn't even have a snowball's chance in hell of getting an unexpected outcome from a certain process, then there is no need to run it through that process." Do you seriously think that this will result in any other outcome besides delete? You will also notice that I didn't cite any of the CSD because none of them apply (even though I think it should be included as one for something this obvious). --Farix (Talk) 12:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, I do know that SNOW is not part of policy. I do know that IAR is "policy" and BTW, I mean't no harm by the comment. So, relax. - Rjd0060 15:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Most of the official secondary characters in this series already have rather limited notability, but it's a hell of a lot more than most (if not all) fan characters. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 02:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • it's known out there... oh right delete with extreme prejudice Circeus 02:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete-- it's like they didn't even try to hide that they copy-pasted it. IzzyFerret 03:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sasuke is not a notable - er, I mean, Kimona is fanfiction and we've always burned those with fire unless there was a lot of 3rd party interest in the fanfiction. --Gwern (contribs) 04:15 14 November 2007 (GMT)
  • Delete: Per above. - Rjd0060 05:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete this has been seen before, although I can't remember the exact name; a hoax article that C&Ps from Sasuke Uchiha and doesn't even bother to change the kana for his name. The user should be blocked as a sockpuppet. JuJube 08:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Perhaps you're thinking of this AfD? That was just more of a case of copying the infobox, not the whole article. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 10:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Missiles locked (delete) per WP:NOT, WP:V, and Hoax. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 11:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - get rid of this crapola. --MimiSard 13:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Wiki is not place for self-made fanfiction/game characters. Yakuzakyuu 14:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete For reasons already stated. -72.70.50.251 19:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete and strike with Chidori and or Rasengan This is a hoax. No such character. The fact that there are no images on this article makes it even more obvious.DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 21:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete and salt per all comments said above. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as per nom. -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 08:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. (Duane543 17:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC))
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.