Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimbolton Avenue, Nottingham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge into Lenton, Nottingham. Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kimbolton Avenue, Nottingham

Kimbolton Avenue, Nottingham (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable - a couple of disputed newspaper allegations in 2006 are not enough. At most it should have a mention in Lenton, Nottingham.  —SMALLJIM  20:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep From what I've seen, there are some partly notable aspects. I've found several related links on Google, some of which seem pretty reliable. The article, while not near perfect, has some sources, Wikilinks, images and such. I'd don't see any reason to delete it. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge into Lenton, Nottingham. Doesn't look notable enough for seperate article. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge not notable enough for a separate article. Only claim of notability is based on disputed statistics that appeared in newspapers in 2006; no significant lasting notability; sourced information can be added to the Lenton, Nottingham article. --Snigbrook (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge per Brewcrewer. Stifle (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.