Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill the Scientist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. - Bobet 22:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kill the Scientist

Removed speedy tag as discography added and I'm a conservative speedy-er. Abstain for now. brenneman^{T}{L} 13:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. --Terence Ong 13:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep passes WP:MUSIC. Bobby1011 14:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • How so? — ciphergoth 17:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
    • • Comments by R paraphrased from discussion on the WP:Music talk page: The WP:MUSIC criteria do not mention anywhere that the bands must be national in scope. Many local bands have in fact released albums (crit#3), have been featured in magazines (crit#4) or indeed are among the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (crit #6). Indeed the point of the criteria is to weed out the examples cited such as teenage garage bands, etc. and not in any way those local bands that have been playing for years, have been featured in local music media, and have locally-successful records. Madangry 02:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment On further review, perhaps is doesn't, though I at first thought that "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." sactioned it. Bobby1011 01:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment- Bobby1011, I agree with your first instinct and all text within your comment's quotations. Madangry 01:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. — ciphergoth 17:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Added discography to article. All releases on discography which also contain articles on Wiki are notable (some had BEEN proposed for deletion but kept by administrators as notable). Did not include self-released cassette releases as noted on official website in discog section, listed only notable releases. (text taken from talk page)Madangry 18:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• COMMENT - Wikipedia should not place "mainstream = notability" constraints on independent music. (Paraphrased from Japanther delete page comments by Howrealisreal) Madangry 22:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• COMMENT - For those of you deeming this non notable or saying it does not meet WP:MUSIC, please read current discussion on [WP: MUSIC]. Madangry 17:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Looks like a keep. Albums make notability. Stifle 00:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Madangry as per myself previously at the Japanther AfD. --Howrealisreal 01:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 14:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment for Keeping article: -Added reviews (good and mediocre) for one of the band's releases reflecting non-biased write ups in verifiable music media, and per the new updated (as of March 1st/2nd 2006) criteria now the article DOES without a doubt pass WP:MUSIC. Madangry 02:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.