Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiley Dean (2nd Nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wizardman 06:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kiley Dean
Fails Wikipedia:Music#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles, no released albums, no reliable sources, no tours, etc. Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Gone, appears to have already been deleted TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Keep, appears to pass WP:MUSIC TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)- Keep - Arguments from previous afd still apply - also featured by MTV [1]. Catchpole (talk) 18:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep had a song on the national charts. Ridernyc (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- This nomination was not linked from the article itself until this point. Now fixed. ➔ REDVEЯS knows how Joan of Arc felt 13:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Ridernyc, also she was signed by/released albums with big record companies which also establishes notability. Rigby27 Talk 14:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Signing w/a major label does not establish notability. The label has apparently declined to release both her albums which would weigh against notability. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 14:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep Seems to squeak by WP:MUSIC: 2 charting singles (albeit on component charts, not main charts) and some mainstream media coverage. What gets me is that no one has added these (and the refs from the 1st afd) to the article. Perhaps when I get a chance I will, if no one else has by then. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 14:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.