Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kikucall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 02:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kikucall

Delete - Non-notable. Barely any press coverage from marginally (if at all) notable sources. Author of article is clearly CEO/Founder himself. Wickethewok 20:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advert. See AfD for InstantCast, below. ConDem^Talk 23:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Darquis 01:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 04:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Condem. -- ReyBrujo 05:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC) per WP:VANITY, While an article about a little-known company, say, should not automatically be taken as a vanity article, it is preferable for the initial author not to be an owner, employee of, or investor in the company. -- ReyBrujo 05:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.