Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kieden

Advertisement; no evidence that company meets WP:CORP; prod tag removed. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 03:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

• Apologies kswensrud 03:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Apologies, was not aware of WP:CORP or WP:VSCA. Although there are hundreds of pages describing small internet-based companies on Wikipedia that appear to be WP:VSCA kswensrud

Comment That's true, and they should also be tagged for deletion. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 14:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment Edited page, removed sections that could be considered advertising. Edited copy to include relevancy to other notable and important topics. kswensrud

• Delete per nom. JoshuaZ 03:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 03:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertisement and non-notable --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, an ad for a company only a few months old. nn per nom. Kuru ^talk 04:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kuru. --Khoikhoi 04:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Chairman S. ^Talk 05:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:CORP; likely WP:VSCA, assuming User:Kswensrud is Kraig Swensrud. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, ad for nn company, vanispamcruftisment. --Terence Ong 15:15, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Moe ε 02:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.