Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidnapping Part 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as copyvio, and to meet its deleted brother at Kidnapping Part 1. Just zis Guy you know? 21:23, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kidnapping Part 2

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Bladeswin 04:39, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, WP:NOR. PJM 04:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT 1.3.4 WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Royboycrashfan 04:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, orginal research. --Terence Ong 04:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete original research, POV. Makemi 05:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, with the suggestion that the author obtain a blog. --djrobgordon 05:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Also, if anyone can find Part 1, it should be AfD'd as well. Unless this is without a predecessor, a la Leonard Part 6. --djrobgordon 05:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as per above... more of a magazine article than an encyclopedia article--Vercalos 05:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Deckiller 05:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Who writes these things? Oh wait, it tells me at the bottom of the page. (Oy vey!) dbtfz^talk 09:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research Where ^(talk) 14:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete original research. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• COPYVIO: this is where this came from. I've tagged and bagged it. JDoorjam Talk 16:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with or without the copyvio. Just zis Guy you know? 21:21, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.