Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kid in Bed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kid in Bed

Article about the closing production logo used by an animation studio, DiC. Obsessive minutiae, nonencyclopedic. tregoweth 03:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per "Obsessive minutiae" MadCow257 04:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete OCD anyone? U$er 04:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Well-researched usefulness. The Disco King 06:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 06:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, unencyclopaedic. --Terence Ong 11:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, logocruft. JIP | Talk 16:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, indeed LogoCruft Deizio 17:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Chaz 18:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 00:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep or Merge with DiC. Closing logos are notable but doesn't perhaps merit its own article. Kit O'Connell (Todfox: user / talk / contribs) 03:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • compromise Only going to hear about this on Wikipedia. This article is well researched and could be useful. Merge with the DiC article. The way the Screen Gems logo was merged. --The_stuart 23:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, Merge, or Compromise Agree with above. Problem is, we got some editors who have a problem with articles that EVEN have a small section of it that talks about logos. The Screen Gems logos was recently deleted by the same editor who's trying to get rid of this acticle (& tried unsuccessfully to delete the one on Viacom's logos a couple of months back) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.29.159 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete NN --rogerd 05:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.