Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kicaster Creek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete it. "Keep or merge?" is an editorial debate — continue it on the talk page. — CharlotteWebb 21:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kicaster Creek

Minor geographic feature. Nothing that asserts notability -Nv8200p talk 04:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Merge (Is that an option?) to Kicaster, Texas (a ghost town nearby). Neither are terribly notable, but perhaps together they can work - Richfife 04:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge per above. --JJay 15:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per above. Eusebeus 16:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I added references and the category Category:Rivers of Texas. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Kicaster, Texas. It's an eleven mile long stream (as in, it's geographically classified as a stream). That's really not notable enough for its own article, whether it's put into categories or not. -- Kicking222 12:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:LOCAL or keep. Verifiable. JYolkowski // talk 22:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.