Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khawja Shams-ud-din Azeemi

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - found to be a copyvio - SimonP 17:33, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Khawja Shams-ud-din Azeemi

Blatant self-promotion, probably non-notable (gets 27 google hits). Delete. - Mustafaa 04:09, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, under the bar of notability, promo. Megan1967 09:26, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Leader of a religious sect, published author. RickK 09:38, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
• If RickK says keep ... probably a keep! Could do with verifiability - David Gerard 19:30, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Article is a copy-and-paste from [www.muraqaba.com], so could be a copy vio—not discounting that the article may have been writted by the owner of that site. It (the site) seems to be a promotion for the book, ISBN 0975887548, rather than a home for the Silsila-Azeemia order; which gives a longer biographical sketch of Azeemi. The Muraqaba site is registered to Plato Publishing Inc. in Houston, and the Silsila-Azeemia site to Cyber World in Abu Dhabi. DialUp 20:06, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Reads like it was scanned right from the dust jacket. Delete this promo. Edeans 03:33, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. What RickK said, though it should probably be sent to clean up and it should be moved to the correct spelling of Khawaja Shams-ud-din Azeemi [1] as opposed to Khawja Shams-ud-din Azeemi [2]. -JCarriker 09:17, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I marked this copyvio. Fawcett5 22:28, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.