Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kharotha-Khel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Bratschetalk 04:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kharotha-Khel

Apart from the fact that this article uses nothing but caps, this topic seems to be made up. A google search query returns nothing, except Wikipedia pages. Therefore; unverifiable, hoax...delete. Image:Weather rain.pngSoothingR 18:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

  • comment Oddly enough, they may be notable. The places are certainly real - they are in Pakistan. The parent tribe given, Daulat Khel, exists and has an article here on WP. They are Pashtuns. It certainly should not be hyphenated - but if the tribe exists it is either misspelled or not much exposure on the Internet. Did you Google the individual names? There is so little information given in the article, it is hard to be sure one has found a match. There seem to be a million Zahid Khans, it is a common last name, but some of the names are first/middle/last and we may be able to make sense of this given time. There are a lot of Khans here [1], for example, some of the names match. I'm going to look a bit more, I would appreciate others also looking, as the article appears to have been written by a non-native speaker of English. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unverifiable. Stifle 23:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I've been looking, but I'm inclined to agree. I have not been able to verify the information as presented. KillerChihuahua?!? 15:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article says "The famous people of this tribe are particularly from one family because of their influence on people due their down to earth policy and their names are...". This is obviously nonsense. utcursch | talk 11:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.