Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin hudak

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 00:56, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kevin hudak

Vanity page;non-notable figure. <-- (VfD page started by User:70.117.193.249, but not completed. Joyous (talk) 03:23, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete vanity. Joyous (talk) 03:23, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete defamatory.69.209.193.114 04:54, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Awesome (preceding unsigned comment by 152.163.100.135 03:41, 8 August 2005 UTC)
• Delete, vanity and probable hoax. Non-notable anyway. Alphax ^τεχ 06:27, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Probable attack page and not of sufficient notability to warrant an article. Capitalistroadster 06:29, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notability confirmed. Just google him. He was the big Dean campaign mole.(preceding unsigned comment by 152.163.100.135 06:32, 8 August 2005 UTC)
• Keep, It has links and the Dartmouth Review has an entry. 129.170.239.110 06:34, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Just needs to be cleaned up a little.(preceding unsigned comment by 129.170.237.34 06:35, 8 August 2005 UTC)
• Speedy Keep. This kind of important information must be available to the rest of the world.(preceding unsigned comment by 152.163.100.135 06:47, 8 August 2005 UTC)
• Strong delete. As it stands, this is either an unencyclopedic hoax/satirical dig in the ribs, or a libellous, completely unverified personal attack.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 08:26:07, 2005-08-08 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as attack page. I think. I mean, even conservatives think its bad to be rude to waiters... right? Sdedeo 09:58, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. attack page --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 10:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above arguments (including the sockpuppets). Punkmorten 11:06, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete The only usefull and verifiable bit of information on the current page is that Mr. Hudak is "president" of the Dartmouth Review. That, and only that, bit of information could be merged into the dartmouth review page. Eclipsed 12:05, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Bullshit. --Sleepyhead81 17:03, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Nonsense. too many socks. -- BD2412 ^talk 17:33, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. Class of 2007? Dunc|☺ 17:37, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless proof can be shown that he's started a trend of being an overt jerk in your conservatism. Around 50% of the conservatives i've met and maybe 10% of the liberals i've met are subtle jerks already. Karmafist 17:40, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup. The man in question can be easily found on Google, but the article just needs to be cleaned up, as not to be such a deliberate attack on Mr. Hudak's character. --Frag 21:00, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as attack page. --Carnildo 22:55, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy nn and attack page. --Etacar11 23:45, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy as attack page, also sockpuppetry. Consensus seems to have been reached. Admin? Proto t c 15:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, vanity, probably hoax. Hall Monitor 23:12, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.