Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Paull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Natalie 02:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kevin Paull

Kevin Paull (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

insufficiently notable, fails WP:PROF Garrie 22:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete It may just be late, but I can't see much point to this entry and I can't see what I might check to find out whether this person is at all notable. The article fails to answer the basic question "why should I read this?" Mike 23:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nominator. He is a principle which in itself is not notable.Garrie 23:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is just ridiculous. How many AfD's on Aquinascruft do we have to go through before it become disruptive? Hesperian 23:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete meets both criteria WP:CSD#A1 and WP:CSD#A7 Gnangarra 01:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 01:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Garrie 02:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy delete. CSD A7. So tagged. Mwelch 02:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.