This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was copyvio, already deleted. — Trilobite (Talk) 02:36, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Most of the page was originally a cut and paste copyright violation (see page history). OK, so he has co-authored a few papers, but nothing seems very notable Bobbis 8 July 2005 18:17 (UTC)
Speedy delete copyvio, user page, resume, vanity, nn -Harmil 8 July 2005 19:32 (UTC)
Delete: what's left is vain junk. Has no user page to userfy too. How surprising. -Splash 9 July 2005 02:02 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.