Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Seed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and userfied. Mailer Diablo 06:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kerry Seed

Vanity article created by subject. Producer on the radio. Kinda notable, but not particularly. Ordinarily I would be inclusionist enough to let it stay, but with the vanity aspect, I have to propose Delete and Userfy - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 00:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: He's a local radio producer. I don't find that extremely notable in and of itself. --Hetar 00:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Yanksox 00:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and userfy per nom. --Bill (who is cool!) 00:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Sounds noteable enough. I added some useful categories. TruthbringerToronto 01:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fledgeling 01:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete per nom.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by JChap2007 (talk • contribs) .
• Delete and userfy per nom. DVD+ R/W 02:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• How about Merge into the guy's user page? Is that what Userfy means? --BrownHornet21 02:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Okay, so that didn't take long. I cut 'n' paste the article to his formerly blank user page (let me know if that's a Wikipedia no-no). My vote is Delete for now, until he becomes a big star and we can all say we knew him back when. --BrownHornet21 03:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. --Terence Ong 03:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete & Userfy per nom. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 05:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy and delete per nom. Clearly vanity... notability is possible, but if he is notable enough, then someone else will create an article about him sooner or later. Comment Do we need to do anything about Blunt Youth Radio Project? Also unsure about edits made to WMPG (as User:Kerryseed and User:72.224.164.251) which have improved the structure but added vanity too. Don't want to encourage vanity, but don't want to be too delete-happy. Paddles ^T_C 06:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I see the page has already been userfied. Molerat 10:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Trebor 11:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy per nom. Xyrael ^T 17:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn Crazynas 18:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Keep. Carr
• 'Delete per nom. It is possible that some of the subject's work may be notable in other contexts, but we shouldn't allow vanity pages. --Cedders^tk 17:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.