Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenzo Tenma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge as noted. Bearian (talk) 14:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kenzo Tenma

Kenzo Tenma (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a character that does not have real world information to establish notability. It is currently covered in the character section of the main article, and there is no current assertion for improvement. TTN (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 17:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Already well covered in Monster (manga). Practically an orphan. I can't even find a link to it from the main article, though its What links here page says there is one. Collectonian (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge. The main article's (short) summary is powerful weaksauce. --Gwern (contribs) 03:16 11 December 2007 (GMT)
• Delete per nom. Not notable. --Jack Merridew 11:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per the guidelines of WP:FICT into Monster (manga) -- which does not, contra above, cover him very well for a protagonist. I would have thought, given this is exactly the sort of award-winning series that becomes a critical darling, and the homage behind his name, that he would have been discussed enough to establish notability, but I'm not finding any reliable sources. If someone else finds something, though, I'll immediately change that to an immediate-and-obvious-keep. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge as per Quasirandom. Edward321 (talk) 00:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Merge, per Quasirandom's reasoning. I just found out tonight that Monster (the anime) has finally be licensed in the States, so there is the potential for his notability to expand in the future (due to the fact that he comes from such an excellent series/manga). Merging key details into his somewhat limited bio would be a good contribution to the main article. bwowen talk•contribs 06:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.