Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent McManigal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No evidence of notability. Pastordavid (talk) 17:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kent_McManigal

Kent_McManigal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Person has absolutely no notability. Was a "candidate for president", but never actually participated in any debate, ran for a party, ran any substantive advertising, received a notable endorsement, or did anything worth noting. Only external source is a candidate platform comparison page, the information for which was contributed by the candidate himself and thus is not noteworthy. While WP:Bio is not razor-like in its precision, he does not meet any of the three criteria listed as potential guidelines for notability of a politician. Considered speedy delete, but figured regular delete would be a better option. Stump (talk) 16:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I'm sure there are many thousands of people who don't get on the ballot on each election. Shiva_eVolved 17:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom -Drdisque (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not notable - Dumelow (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.