Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Cummins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kent Cummins

Kent Cummins (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Probable WP:SPAM, WP:COI. Leuko 02:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

  • I don't know. The guy has written two books, which is more then some of the people we keep around, plus he is an Austinite, which automatically makes him a good guy and I like the picture in the article. -Nv8200p talk 02:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment: WP:BIO requires "Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work," not just the fact that they published something. Please also see this and this. Leuko 03:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment: Nv8200p, please make an argument for keeping or deleting based on Wikipedia policy. Thanks! --Dhartung | Talk 06:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment The fact that you like it isn't a valid argument. Veinor (talk to me) 21:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:BIO. I only found this lone article[1] and nothing in the way of book reviews. Locally notable, that's it. --Dhartung | Talk 06:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:BIO and WP:V by end of this AfD Alf photoman 14:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge This article could be merged into the The Magic Camp article. 22:25, 13 February 2007 ZimmerBarnes 22:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)ZimmerBarnes
  • Delete personal promo. Seems like a nice guy though. Wile E. Heresiarch 10:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.