Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenophobia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kenophobia

Kenophobia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete contested prod; has been copied to wiktionary and is nothing more than a WP:DICDEF. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Next time, please use the criteria for speedy deletion RogueNinja_talk 19:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
• delete not nly is this just a definition, I can't find any reliable sources to back it up Beeblbrox (talk) 23:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms isn't reliable? Not sure what to do about the article; what's the modus operandi for psych articles like these? Octane ^{[improve me]}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.